-
Committer:
John Arbash Meinel
-
Date:
2010-12-01 22:50:08 UTC
-
Revision ID:
john@arbash-meinel.com-20101201225008-h8065d63rq03shdr
peek() seems to shave about 5% (5s reduction, over ~100s total time).
I don't know that we need it as a separate 'inline' function, but it is definitely
useful to peek() before doing the full test.
With peek, we get about 217M peek skips, 166M no-actual-matches, out of 392M
matches that aren't good enough, and 420M total matches.