- Committer: Fabien MORIN
- Date: 2016-01-04 13:16:43 UTC
- Revision ID: fabien.morin@tempo-consulting.fr-20160104131643-yg05m7g044qrom9w
SP-223 [FIX] After discussion with JFB, the way to introduce force_no_order
parameter was bad because it implies too heavy modifications on the whole code.
It is better to use existing 'order' parameter, 'limit' and 'count' as a
combination to get the same result and force removing 'ORDER BY' in the case
that doesnt need it.
parameter was bad because it implies too heavy modifications on the whole code.
It is better to use existing 'order' parameter, 'limit' and 'count' as a
combination to get the same result and force removing 'ORDER BY' in the case
that doesnt need it.
| Filename | Latest Rev | Last Changed | Committer | Comment | Size | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 ..
|
|||||||
__init__.py |
559.15.3 | 13 years ago | jf | Data supply | Empty |
|
|
|
__openerp__.py |
793 | 12 years ago | jf | UF-955 [DEV] Reporting (Month-end) - 2 remaining r | 1.3 KB |
|
|
|
data.xml |
1382.2.1 | 12 years ago | jf | New expiry date in supply data | 44.7 KB |
|
|