~zaber/openobject-addons/stable_5.0-extra-addons
» Revision
3531.2.2
: comparison/website/erpComparator/erpcomparator/subcontrollers/templates/about.kid
« back to all changes in this revision
Viewing changes to comparison/website/erpComparator/erpcomparator/subcontrollers/templates/about.kid
- browse files at revision 3531.2.2
- compare with another revision
- download diff
- download tarball
- view history from revision 3531.2.2
- Committer: Olivier Laurent
- Date: 2009-01-30 12:28:04 UTC
- mfrom: (3516.4.3 trunk-extra-addons)
- mto: (3531.3.2 extraaddons_trunk) (3537.2.3 trunk-extra-addons)
- mto: This revision was merged to the branch mainline in revision 3533.
- Revision ID: olt@tinyerp.com-20090130122804-42m1mkykwpik9hgs
[MERGE]
- files modified:
- comparison/comparison.py
added
removed
comparison/website/erpComparator/erpcomparator/subcontrollers/templates/about.kid
6
6
<title>Comparison</title>
7
7
</head>
8
8
<body>
9
<table id="bodybackground" style="padding: 5px; text-align: justify; width: 890px;">
10
<tr>
11
<td>
12
<div id="checkboxtext" style="font-family: Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-size: 12px;">
13
<b>Introduction</b><br/>
14
15
<p style="text-align: justify;">
16
Evaluation-Matrix is a collaborative platform dedicated to evaluate current
17
best enterprise management softwares. We focus on a pragmatic approach based
18
on reliable and quantifiable criterions.
19
</p>
20
<p style="text-align: justify;">
21
Evaluation-Matrix follows two different objectives:<br/>
22
* Building a rated features list reflecting users most common needs and,<br/>
23
* Having a way to evaluate available softwares on the market.
24
</p>
25
<p style="text-align: justify;">
26
Our first goal is to precisely define the list of criterions most requested on
27
the market. This list is hierarchised based on users most common needs. A
28
ponderation is defined on each criterion to reflect the demand on each
29
particular feature. The highest the ponderation is, the most requested the
30
feature is.
31
</p>
32
<p style="text-align: justify;">
33
Based on this list of criterions, our second goal is to evaluate the
34
functionnal and technical coverage of the most used softwares. This allows
35
us to display the result as an evaluation matrix, comparing the different
36
solutions.
37
</p>
38
<p style="text-align: justify;">
39
As to maintain and constantly improve the criterions and features list,
40
Evaluation-Matrix is based on a collaborative approach. Each user can propose
41
new criterions, vote for the pondderation of a criterion or help to evaluate
42
a particular software.
43
</p>
44
45
<b>Methodology</b><br/>
46
47
<p style="text-align: justify;">
48
Evaluating a software is not an easy task as much of the features are present
49
in several softwares in different forms: from the simplest and easiest one to
50
the complete but complex ones. As to avoid subjectivness of contributors, we
51
decided to base our evaluation criterions based on factual data.
52
</p>
53
<p style="text-align: justify;">
54
For example, we do not try to judge or vote on the quality of a feature because
55
it depends too much on the need of a user. So, we perfer computing the quality
56
of a feature based on the availability or not of sub-features.
57
</p>
58
<p style="text-align: justify;">
59
<ul><i>Bad criterions :</i>
60
<li>Has the software a good multi-warehouse stock management system ? <br/>
61
- Adjectives like 'good' are too subjective, you should only focus on the
62
existance or not of some features.</li>
63
<li>Does the software has an analytic accounting module ?<br/>
64
- This question is not precise. All accouting software have analytic
65
accounting features. So this should be a features with several children
66
criterions to compute the quality of the analytic accounting solution.</li>
67
<li>Ability to create a product form ?<br/>
68
- This question is not usefull as all software will fit this criterion.</li></ul>
69
<ul><i>Good criterions :</i>
70
<li>Can you define an unlimitted number of warehouses for stock management ?</li></ul>
71
</p>
72
73
<b>How to propose a new application ?</b><br/>
74
<p style="text-align: justify;">
75
We plan to extend the platform to evaluate any kind of enterprise management
76
application. From the complete ERP to the smallest application dedicated to a
77
very specific need.
78
</p>
79
<p style="text-align: justify;">
80
<Contact us> if you want to suggest new applications to be included in the
81
list. Send us a description of the application, the links to the editor website
82
and the <following file> where you have completed the second column. Keep empty
83
the cells for which you don't know the exact answer.
84
</p>
85
<p style="text-align: justify;">
86
To contact us, send an email to contact@evaluation-matrix.com.
87
</p>
88
<p style="text-align: justify;">
89
<b>NOTE :</b> following file, must be a link to a .csv file with :<br/>
90
id<br/>
91
criterion_name<br/>
92
evaluation (empty column)<br/>
93
</p>
94
95
<b>About Us</b><br/>
96
97
<p style="text-align: justify;">
98
Evaluation-Matrix has been made by a group of people sharing the same
99
interrests in enterprise management softwares. We often have to compare
100
different softwares or find the software that fits best the customer need.
101
As to avoid redoing each time the same study or comparisons, we decided to
102
setup this platform.
103
</p>
104
<p style="text-align: justify;">
105
In january 2009, we launched evaluation-matrix starting with the current 5 most
106
important ERP softwares in the world: SAP, Microsoft Navision, Sage L100, Open
107
ERP and Open Bravo.
108
</p>
109
<p style="text-align: justify;">
110
To start with a complete content, we sub-contracted evaluations for the softwares
111
we did not had any specific knowledge. It allowed us to launch evaluation-matrix
112
with about 800 criterions and the evaluation of these criterions for the
113
selected softwares.
114
</p>
115
<p style="text-align: justify;">
116
We plan to extend the evaluation matrix to new applications. Feel free to contact
117
us to send us a suggestion.
118
</p>
119
</div>
120
</td>
121
</tr>
122
</table>
9
<div id="bodybackground">
10
<div style="height: 46px; width: 890px; float: left;">
11
<div style="float:left;width:9;">
12
<img src="/static/images/whitebg.gif" alt="" width="9" height="46"/>
13
</div>
14
<div style="float:left;width:172;">
15
<a href="#" onclick="window.location.href='/comparison'" onmouseover="document.comparison_image.src='/static/images/comparison_hover.jpg'" onmouseout="document.comparison_image.src='/static/images/comparison.jpg'">
16
<img src="/static/images/comparison.jpg" name="comparison_image" alt="" border="0" width="172" height="46"/>
17
</a>
18
</div>
19
<div style="float:left; width:175; height:46;">
20
<a href="#" onclick="window.location.href='/graph'" onmouseover="document.graph_image.src='/static/images/graphs_hover.jpg'" onmouseout="document.graph_image.src='/static/images/graphs.jpg'">
21
<img src="/static/images/graphs.jpg" name="graph_image" alt="" border="0" width="175" height="46"/>
22
</a>
23
</div>
24
<div style="float:left;width:176;">
25
<a href="#" onclick="window.location.href='/softwares'" onmouseover="document.software_image.src='/static/images/software_hover.jpg'" onmouseout="document.software_image.src='/static/images/software.jpg'">
26
<img src="/static/images/software.jpg" name="software_image" alt="" border="0" width="176" height="46"/>
27
</a>
28
</div>
29
<div style="float:left;width:176;">
30
<a href="#" onclick="window.location.href='/document'" onmouseover="document.document_image.src='/static/images/document_hover.jpg'" onmouseout="document.document_image.src='/static/images/document.jpg'">
31
<img src="/static/images/document.jpg" name="document_image" alt="" border="0" width="176" height="46"/>
32
</a>
33
</div>
34
<div style="float:left;width:173;">
35
<a href="#" onclick="window.location.href='/about'">
36
<img src="/static/images/about_hover.jpg" name="about_image" alt="" border="0" width="173" height="46"/>
37
</a>
38
</div>
39
<div style="float:left;width:9;">
40
<img src="/static/images/rightwhitebg.gif" alt="" width="9" height="46"/>
41
</div>
42
</div>
43
<div>
44
<img src="/static/images/bluebgimage.png"/>
45
</div>
46
47
<div id="checkboxtext" style="margin: auto; width: 850px; font-family: Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-size: 12px;">
48
<b>Introduction</b><br/>
49
50
<p style="text-align: justify;">
51
Evaluation-Matrix is a collaborative platform dedicated to evaluate current
52
best enterprise management softwares. We focus on a pragmatic approach based
53
on reliable and quantifiable criterions.
54
</p>
55
<p style="text-align: justify;">
56
Evaluation-Matrix follows two different objectives:<br/>
57
* Building a rated features list reflecting users most common needs and,<br/>
58
* Having a way to evaluate available softwares on the market.
59
</p>
60
<p style="text-align: justify;">
61
Our first goal is to precisely define the list of criterions most requested on
62
the market. This list is hierarchised based on users most common needs. A
63
ponderation is defined on each criterion to reflect the demand on each
64
particular feature. The highest the ponderation is, the most requested the
65
feature is.
66
</p>
67
<p style="text-align: justify;">
68
Based on this list of criterions, our second goal is to evaluate the
69
functionnal and technical coverage of the most used softwares. This allows
70
us to display the result as an evaluation matrix, comparing the different
71
solutions.
72
</p>
73
<p style="text-align: justify;">
74
As to maintain and constantly improve the criterions and features list,
75
Evaluation-Matrix is based on a collaborative approach. Each user can propose
76
new criterions, vote for the pondderation of a criterion or help to evaluate
77
a particular software.
78
</p>
79
80
<b>Methodology</b><br/>
81
82
<p style="text-align: justify;">
83
Evaluating a software is not an easy task as much of the features are present
84
in several softwares in different forms: from the simplest and easiest one to
85
the complete but complex ones. As to avoid subjectivness of contributors, we
86
decided to base our evaluation criterions based on factual data.
87
</p>
88
<p style="text-align: justify;">
89
For example, we do not try to judge or vote on the quality of a feature because
90
it depends too much on the need of a user. So, we perfer computing the quality
91
of a feature based on the availability or not of sub-features.
92
</p>
93
<p style="text-align: justify;">
94
<ul><i>Bad criterions :</i>
95
<li>Has the software a good multi-warehouse stock management system ? <br/>
96
- Adjectives like 'good' are too subjective, you should only focus on the
97
existance or not of some features.</li>
98
<li>Does the software has an analytic accounting module ?<br/>
99
- This question is not precise. All accouting software have analytic
100
accounting features. So this should be a features with several children
101
criterions to compute the quality of the analytic accounting solution.</li>
102
<li>Ability to create a product form ?<br/>
103
- This question is not usefull as all software will fit this criterion.</li></ul>
104
<ul><i>Good criterions :</i>
105
<li>Can you define an unlimitted number of warehouses for stock management ?</li></ul>
106
</p>
107
108
<b>How to propose a new application ?</b><br/>
109
<p style="text-align: justify;">
110
We plan to extend the platform to evaluate any kind of enterprise management
111
application. From the complete ERP to the smallest application dedicated to a
112
very specific need.
113
</p>
114
<p style="text-align: justify;">
115
<Contact us> if you want to suggest new applications to be included in the
116
list. Send us a description of the application, the links to the editor website
117
and the <following file> where you have completed the second column. Keep empty
118
the cells for which you don't know the exact answer.
119
</p>
120
<p style="text-align: justify;">
121
To contact us, send an email to contact@evaluation-matrix.com.
122
</p>
123
<p style="text-align: justify;">
124
<b>NOTE :</b> following file, must be a link to a .csv file with :<br/>
125
id<br/>
126
criterion_name<br/>
127
evaluation (empty column)<br/>
128
</p>
129
130
<b>About Us</b><br/>
131
132
<p style="text-align: justify;">
133
Evaluation-Matrix has been made by a group of people sharing the same
134
interrests in enterprise management softwares. We often have to compare
135
different softwares or find the software that fits best the customer need.
136
As to avoid redoing each time the same study or comparisons, we decided to
137
setup this platform.
138
</p>
139
<p style="text-align: justify;">
140
In january 2009, we launched evaluation-matrix starting with the current 5 most
141
important ERP softwares in the world: SAP, Microsoft Navision, Sage L100, Open
142
ERP and Open Bravo.
143
</p>
144
<p style="text-align: justify;">
145
To start with a complete content, we sub-contracted evaluations for the softwares
146
we did not had any specific knowledge. It allowed us to launch evaluation-matrix
147
with about 800 criterions and the evaluation of these criterions for the
148
selected softwares.
149
</p>
150
<p style="text-align: justify;">
151
We plan to extend the evaluation matrix to new applications. Feel free to contact
152
us to send us a suggestion.
153
</p>
154
</div>
155
</div>
123
156
</body>
124
157
</html>
b'\\ No newline at end of file'
Loggerhead is a web-based interface for Breezy
Version: 2.0.1