525
525
//! @return Delta-T in seconds
526
526
double getDeltaTByReingoldDershowitz(const double jDay);
528
//! Get Delta-T estimation for a given date.
529
//! Implementation of algorithm by Banjevic (2006) for DeltaT computation.
530
//! Source: Ancient eclipses and dating the fall of Babylon
532
//! Publications of the Astronomical Observatory of Belgrade, Vol. 80, p. 251-257 (2006)
533
//! 2006POBeo..80..251B [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006POBeo..80..251B]
534
//! @param jDay the date and time expressed as a julian day
535
//! @return Delta-T in seconds
536
double getDeltaTByBanjevic(const double jDay);
538
//! Get Delta-T estimation for a given date.
539
//! Implementation of algorithm by Islam, Sadiq & Qureshi (2008 + revisited 2013) for DeltaT computation.
540
//! Source: Error Minimization of Polynomial Approximation of DeltaT
541
//! Islam, S. & Sadiq, M. & Qureshi, M. S.
542
//! Journal of Astrophysics & Astronomy, Vol. 29, p. 363–366 (2008)
543
//! http://www.ias.ac.in/jaa/dec2008/JAA610.pdf
544
//! Note: These polynomials are based on the uncorrected deltaT table from the Astronomical Almanac, thus
545
//! ndot = -26.0 arcsec/cy^2. Meeus & Simons (2000) corrected the deltaT table for years before 1955.5 using
546
//! ndot = -25.7376 arcsec/cy^2. Therefore the accuracies stated by Meeus & Simons are correct and cannot be
547
//! compared with accuracies from Islam & Sadiq & Qureshi.
548
//! @param jDay the date and time expressed as a julian day
549
//! @return Delta-T in seconds
550
double getDeltaTByIslamSadiqQureshi(const double jDay);
528
552
//! Get Secular Acceleration estimation for a given year.
529
553
//! Method described is here: http://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/SEcat5/secular.html
530
554
//! For adapting from -26 to -25.858, use -0.91072 * (-25.858 + 26.0) = -0.12932224